« "The Prison Pleading Trap" | Main | Interesting report on the echoes of the Supreme Court's recent Ruan decision »
September 18, 2022
Notable developments as defense rests in capital trial of Parkland school shooter
I have been following the capital sentencing trial of Parkland school shooter Nikolas Cruz somewhat more closely than I follow other capital trials in part because the case involves such competing extremes. This case is the deadliest U.S. mass shooting to ever reach trial, involves no question about guilt and the 17 victims were mostly students with many as young as 14. And yet Nikolas Cruz's defense team has presented a considerable mitigation case highlighting his damaged upbringing and considerable mental health issues.
The Cruz defense team rested its case in mitigation last week sooner than had been expected, and that led to a reaction by the presiding trial judge which has now produced a defense motion to remove the judge. Here are some headlines and ledes from a few stories covering these latest developments:
"Parkland school shooter's defense team demands judge be removed after heated exchange"
The attorneys representing the Parkland school shooter filed a motion Friday asking for the judge overseeing his sentencing trial to be replaced. The motion comes after the judge and the defense attorneys had an unusually heated exchange on Wednesday, in which the judge accused the attorneys of a lack of professionalism.
The motion alleges that Circuit Judge Elizabeth Scherer's conduct during the Wednesday exchange revealed "long-held" animosity toward the defense counsel that has "infected" the proceedings and will prevent their client from getting a fair trial.
"Parkland defense has convinced some that killer deserves mercy"
The sudden end of the defense case in the Parkland mass shooting trial this week drew criticism of and from the presiding judge, temporarily overshadowing the biggest question at issue — was enough evidence presented to convince a jury to spare the defendant’s life?
It’s impossible to say for sure — juries are notoriously unpredictable. But at least one expert, and some trial observers, say they would not be surprised if the jury in the Marjory Stoneman Douglas mass shooting case were to show mercy toward confessed gunman Nikolas Cruz.
Some prior related posts:
- Contemplating the capital prosecution of Parkland school shooter Nikolas Cruz
- In shadow of Parkland, a notable discussion with victim families about capital prosecutions in Florida
- "Nikolas Cruz’s birth mom had a violent, criminal past. Could it help keep him off Death Row?"
- A year after tragedy, taking stock of the agony (and wondering about the costs) already surrounding the capital prosecution of Parkland shooter Nikolas Cruz
- Father of Parkland school shooting victim urges state prosecutors to abandon capital prosecution of shooter
- Will guilty pleas and apology reduce odds that Nikolas Cruz is sentenced to death for Parkland school mass murder?
- What is the price (for victims and taxpayers) of a four-month(!) capital trial for Parkland mass murderer Nikolas Cruz?
- Defense beginning mitigation case in the capital trial of Parkland shooter Nikolas Cruz
September 18, 2022 at 11:36 AM | Permalink