« Latest issue of Federal Sentencing Reporter now available: "New U.S. Sentencing Commission Gets to Work" | Main | Buffalo mass shooter formally sentenced to LWOP in New York state court »
February 15, 2023
New Sentencing Project report: "Counting Down: Paths to a 20-Year Maximum Prison Sentence"
The folks at the Sentencing Project have long advocated for an absolute limit on the length of prison terms, and this new 20-page report on the topic is titled "Counting Down: Paths to a 20-Year Maximum Prison Sentence." Here is part of the report's executive summary:
In the United States, over half of people in prison are serving a decade or longer and one in seven incarcerated people are serving a life sentence. To end mass incarceration, the United States must dramatically shorten sentences. Capping sentences for the most serious offenses at 20 years and shifting sentences for all other offenses proportionately downward, including by decriminalizing some acts, is a vital decarceration strategy to arrive at a system that values human dignity and prioritizes racial equity.
This report begins by examining the evidence in support of capping sentences at 20 years. Countries such as Germany and Norway illustrate that sentences can be far shorter without sacrificing public safety. A wealth of criminological evidence makes clear that unduly long sentences are unnecessary: people age out of crime, and even the general threat of long term imprisonment is an ineffective deterrent.
The Sentencing Project recommends the following seven legislative reforms to cap sentences at 20 years and right-size the sentencing structure:
1. Abolish death and life without parole (LWOP) sentences, limiting maximum sentences to 20 years.
2. Limit murder statutes to intentional killings, excluding offenses such as felony murder, and reduce homicide penalties.
3. Eliminate mandatory minimum sentences and reform sentencing guidelines to ensure that judges can use their discretion to consider mitigating circumstances.
4. Provide universal access to parole and ensure timely review.
5. Eliminate consecutive sentences and limit sentence enhancements, including repealing “truth-in-sentencing” and “habitual offender” laws.
6. Create an opportunity for judicial “second look” resentencing within a maximum of 10 years of imprisonment, regardless of an individual’s offense.
7. Shift all sentences downward, including by de-felonizing many offenses and decriminalizing many misdemeanors.
Finally, this report offers ideas for how stakeholders can take steps toward shrinking sentences today. Prosecuting attorneys can use their discretion to limit sentences to 20 years when charging and plea bargaining, as well as engage in sentence review. Judges can impose lower sentences where possible. And communities can invest in interventions that prevent long sentences by keeping people from entering or reentering the criminal legal system altogether. Limiting maximum terms to 20 years need not be the end goal of criminal legal reform — 20 years is still an extraordinary length of time in prison — but it is an essential step toward a fair and proportionate justice system.
February 15, 2023 at 09:59 AM | Permalink
Comments
From a strictly utilitarian POV, I tend to agree that very few sentences >20 years make any sense. But there are surely some that do. I know Jeffrey Dahmer was killed in prison, but had he survived, would you have been comfortable releasing him after 20 years?
Posted by: Marc Shepherd | Feb 15, 2023 5:35:33 PM