« Vera Institute of Justice presents "A New Paradigm for Sentencing in the United States" | Main | Latest issue of Federal Sentencing Reporter now available: "New U.S. Sentencing Commission Gets to Work" »

February 14, 2023

"Rape as Indignity"

The title of this post is the title of this new paper authored by Ben McJunkin now available via SSRN. Here is its abstract:

Rape law has a consent problem.  The topic of sexual consent predominates any discussion of rape law, both doctrinally and socially.  It is now widely taken as axiomatic that non-consensual sex is paradigmatic of rape.  But consent is in fact a deeply contested concept, as recent debates over affirmative consent have demonstrated. Grounding rape law in sexual non-consent has also proven both over- and under-inclusive, too often leaving the law inadequate to vindicate some sexual harms and distorted in attempts to reach others.  Increasingly, the very concept of consent is being questioned by scholars, who desire a rape law that more accurately reflects the lived experience of both victims and perpetrators. Consent is even potentially dangerous.  The structure of consent reinforces problematic gender roles in sexual relations and fuels troubling narratives that have led to widespread violence against women.

This Article proposes a novel grounding for rape law — not as a matter of consent, but as a matter of human dignity. Human dignity has been perhaps the premier value in both political and moral thought over the past two centuries. As the Article documents, dignity’s relatively straightforward moral imperative — respect for persons — has a long tradition of being operationalized legally, making it ripe for use as the basis of a criminal prohibition.  Building upon both federal and state efforts to combat the indignities of sex trafficking, the Article outlines a proposed framework for punishing as rape the infliction of indignity through certain means of compelling sex, namely force, fraud, and coercion. Centering human dignity, rather than consent, would more closely align rape law with the fundamental tenets of criminal law theory and has the potential to disrupt gendered social scripts that increasingly animate violence.  In a time of mass incarceration, recognizing rape as indignity would also set the stage for a much-needed shift toward restorative justice and incarceration alternatives.

February 14, 2023 at 09:52 AM | Permalink


This seems stupid--as what makes rape rape is the lack of consent . . . .

Posted by: federalist | Feb 14, 2023 10:07:32 AM

I think this is the first time I've ever agreed with Federalist. I suspect that Mr. McJunkin has never had sex. It's never dignified.

Posted by: Keith Lynch | Feb 14, 2023 4:47:57 PM

Rape is an attack. There is no discussion of "may I"? This "consent" diversion is bilge that arises when 2 folks are in close quarters.
Real, ghastly rape is the work of predatory male monsters. They don't give you the opportunity to object.

Posted by: Fluffyross | Feb 15, 2023 9:41:23 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB