« Justice Department formally gives BOP discretion to decide who moved to home confinement during pandemic will be returned to federal prison | Main | Notable recent new coverage of the not-so-new horrors of solitary confinement »

April 5, 2023

Among many big amendment questions, will the new USSC promulgate new guidelines to limit acquitted conduct enhancements?

As flagged in this post a few weeks ago, we can expect the US Sentencing Commission to vote to promulgate its first set of new guidelines amendments in five years later today.  Specifically, the announcement here on the Commission's website notes that "a public meeting of the Commission was scheduled for Wednesday, April 5, 2023, at 2:00 p.m." and that the agenda will include a "Vote to Promulgate Proposed Amendments."  As I have explained before, and as detailed in some of the prior posts below, there has been significant debate about the significant draft proposed amendments that were released by the USSC earlier this year.  One of those possible amendments in newly discussed in this lengthy Bloomberg Law piece titled "Sentencing Commission to Vote on Handling of Acquitted Conduct."  Here are excerpts (with links from the original):

The US Sentencing Commission is expected on Wednesday to vote on an amendment that would eliminate acquitted conduct from the definition of relevant conduct for purposes of calculating the guidelines range.

Judges would still be able to consider acquitted conduct that was proven beyond a reasonable doubt or admitted by the defendant in plea proceedings or a colloquy.

The amendment has wide support from the defense bar, current and former federal judges, and three US Senators, although some say it won’t completely solve the problem.

Others, including the Victims Advisory Group, oppose the changes, arguing that courts need to be able to consider the full context of an offense. In its opposition, the Department of Justice emphasized the difficulty judges may have in determining what conduct they can or can’t consider.

In addition to perhaps addressing acquitted conduct, the Commission will also certainly put forward amendments concerning the grounds for compassionate release which will certainly impact many prisoners nationwide. A number of other possible amendments being considered by the Commission could also prove quite consequential. Interesting times.

A few recent related posts:

April 5, 2023 at 12:44 AM | Permalink

Comments

I have my doubts that the Commission can overrule the Supreme Court's decision in Watts, but maybe they teach judicial hierarchy differently at Harvard.

Posted by: Bill Otis | Apr 8, 2023 11:52:33 AM

Bill, since you seemingly do not understand the basic holding in Booker, I do not think it much worth debating (or trying to explain) specific sentencing doctines in order to explain why the USSC's proposed guideline amendment would not formally amount to an effort "to overrule Watts." (But, in the hope of preventing others from being confused by your comment, I will note that Justices Breyer and Scalia debated whether the USSC could issue guidelines that limited sentencing consideration of acquitted conduct in light of the the broad terms of the statutory text of 18 USC 3661. Unless one contends that many other guidelines limiting various considerations are problematic under 18 USC 3661, I think Justice Bryer has the better of this debate.)

Posted by: Doug B | Apr 8, 2023 1:24:01 PM

Doug --

1. "Bill, since you seemingly do not understand the basic holding in Booker, I do not think it much worth debating (or trying to explain) specific sentencing doctines in order to explain why the USSC's proposed guideline amendment would not formally amount to an effort 'to overrule Watts.'"

Oh man is "formally" doing a lot of heavy lifting there!

2. Breyer is a really smart guy, and a courteous and friendly man. In a debate between him and Scalia -- a once-in-a-century genius -- I know who I'm taking.

Posted by: Bill Otis | Apr 8, 2023 3:01:00 PM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB