« After another federal indictment, another set of federal sentencing issues for former Prez Trump | Main | US Sentencing Commission posts over 450 pages of public comment on proposed priorities »

August 5, 2023

"Beyond Bars: A Path Forward from 50 Years of Mass Incarceration in the United States"

The title of this post is the title of this new (open access) book editted by Kristen Budd, David Lane, Glenn Muschert and Jason Smith. Here is how it is described:  

The year 2023 marks 50 years of mass incarceration in the United States.  This timely volume highlights and addresses pressing social problems associated with the U.S.’s heavy reliance on mass imprisonment.  In an atmosphere of charged political debate, including “tough on crime” rhetoric, the editors bring together scholars and experts in the criminal justice field to provide the most up-to-date science on mass incarceration and its ramifications on justice-impacted people and our communities.

This book offers practical solutions for advocates, policy and lawmakers, and the wider public for addressing mass incarceration and its effects to create a more just, fair and safer society.

The Table of Contents lists 10 substantive chapters in this text, and here are just a few of the many chapters that may be of particular interest to sentencing fans:

Mass incarceration’s lifetime guarantee by Ashley Nellis

Mass incarceration and the collateral problems of parole by Kimberly D. Richman

The end of mass incarceration: opportunities for reform by Francis T. Cullen, Justin T. Pickett, and Cheryl Lero Jonson

The final chapter of this book, authored by Cullen et al., develops the thesis that the "era of mass incarceration has ended," and it concludes with this paragraph:

In closing, historical turning points are not always apparent to those in their midst but become evident only in retrospect some years later.  Thus, we trust we have been convincing in showing that mass incarceration has ended — both in terms of the growth of prison populations and the punitive logic that fueled the movement.  This good news, however, will be squandered if a collateral movement to transform American corrections lays dormant.  However, a shortcut may be possible.  It is insufficient to identify past mistakes; future choices must occur.  The opportunity for change is palpable.  Are we up to creating a new era of reform — a humanitarian revolution in corrections?

August 5, 2023 at 04:46 PM | Permalink

Comments

I fixed it for them.

“In an atmosphere of charged political debate, including “tough on crime” rhetoric, the editors bring together scholars and experts in the criminal justice field, all with the exact same ideology other than a token libertarian, to provide the most up-to-date science on mass incarceration and its ramifications on justice-impacted people and our communities.”

Diversity dies in academia.

Posted by: TarlsQtr | Aug 5, 2023 11:00:41 PM

I lived thru the peak of Mass Incarceration in Federal prisons, when they were so over-crowded (populations far beyond the design capacity of the prisons) that the Bureau of Prisons had to keep more than 100 inmates per prison in The Hole (the Special Housing Unit) at all times, because they did not have enough beds on the Compound for the number of inmates being housed there. Inmates were locked up for petty b.s., or placed in The Hole for up to 6 months at a time "under investigation", but then released with no disciplinary charges being filed. Federal prisons are miserable places to work. Despite the high pay and early retirement after 25 years of service, the BOP does not like to discuss the fact that the suicide rate for guards is 3 times the rate for inmates! Mass incarceration is too expensive and it doesn't solve society's drug problems and associated violence.

Posted by: Jim Gormley | Aug 6, 2023 6:24:33 AM

Short translation: Are we up to re-creating the crime ridden failures of the Sixties, Seventies and Eighties when the first iteration of this baloney was all the rage?

Posted by: Bill Otis | Aug 6, 2023 2:16:27 PM

Bill - there are multiple reasons why crime went up in the Sixties, Seventies and Eighties and most of them had little to do with police/prisons. Even if crime did go up directly because of those reforms, a more humanitarian approach to crime will be more humane and compassionate in the long run. Brett Miler

Posted by: Brett Miler | Aug 6, 2023 3:37:38 PM

Brett Miller --

I can think of little that has more humanitarian value than reducing the suffering of crime victims by reducing their number. That's what we did 1991 - 2014 with more cops and incarceration. To become a more humane society, that's what we should do again.

Posted by: Bill Otis | Aug 6, 2023 5:42:54 PM

Bill - don’t be so quick to dismiss efforts to reduce incarceration as “baloney”. Reducing incarceration can have net benefits for society in the long term. Brett Miler

Posted by: Brett Miler | Aug 7, 2023 1:40:51 PM

Brett Miller --

"Reducing incarceration can have net benefits for society in the long term."

Hello!!!

We have reduced incarceration for the last eight years and crime is up. Is that a net benefit for society?

We increased incarceration for the 20 years 1990 - 2010 and crime went down -- way down. Was that a net detriment for society?

Facts count.

Posted by: Bill Otis | Aug 7, 2023 3:17:41 PM

Bill is intent on convincing us all that his unsupported opinion proves that he is right (which is the most important part of his posting - that he is 'right' and everyone else, 'wrong'). It is nothing more than an opinion, not fact.

It seems that in Bill's mind, "correlations" equal "causations".

Bill's unsupported premise is: "Crime rates were going up in the 1990's, and 'tough on crime' policies resulted in a reduction in crime rates.

Not true, Bill.

I strongly urge everyone to please read/review this 'Atlantic' article from 2016:

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/04/what-caused-the-crime-decline/477408/

Quoting from this article:

"But the forces that drove the Great American Crime Decline remain a mystery. Theories abound among sociologists, economists, and political scientists about the causes, with some hypotheses stronger than others. But there’s no real consensus among scholars about what caused one of the largest social shifts in modern American history".

Posted by: SG | Aug 8, 2023 8:48:24 PM

Well said SG. I like reading what Bill has to say but it seems he only has one mindset on crime (more incarceration and police) and he is resistant to change his opinion no matter what other facts are presented to him. Brett Miler
P.S. Bill - thank you for responding to my comments

Posted by: Brett Miler | Aug 8, 2023 9:20:16 PM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB