« Two new papers examining administrative law issues around USSC's new sentence reduction guideline | Main | "Race, class, and criminal adjudication: Is the US criminal justice system as biased as is often assumed? A meta-analytic review" »
January 5, 2024
A more detailed accounting of Jan 6 riot sentencings
In this post yesterday, I noted a new New York Times review and accounting of the prosecutions of January 6 rioters three years after their misdeeds. A helpful reader alerted me to this new Washington Post piece which provides an even more detailed accounting of sentencing outcomes for this large group of federal defendants. The WaPo piece is headlined "Most Jan. 6 defendants get time behind bars, but less than U.S. seeks," and here are excerpts from a lengthy article worth reading in full:
Judges have ordered prison time for nearly every defendant convicted of a felony and some jail time to about half of those convicted of misdemeanors.
But in the vast majority of the more than 700 sentencings to date, judges have issued punishments below government guidelines and prosecutors’ requests. Though more than 60 percent of the defendants sentenced so far have received jail or prison terms, the judges have gone below federal sentencing guidelines in 67 percent of the cases, Post data shows. Nationally, federal judges go below the advisory guidelines about 51 percent of the time, according to federal statistics....
Sentencings greatly increased in 2023, with nearly 370 defendants sentenced in one year, after less than 360 were sentenced in the previous two years. And the percentage of people receiving terms of incarceration increased from 56 percent to 64 percent as more serious felony cases were completed.
For those charged with lesser misdemeanors, about half received a jail sentence averaging 58 days, while about a third received probation and 18 percent were ordered to spend time in home confinement. The incarceration rate for Jan. 6 misdemeanants is higher than for other federal misdemeanants because it came in the context of a mob assault that helped make the breach possible. For those convicted of felonies, 94 percent were ordered behind bars, a consistent rate every year.
Of 244 felony sentencings for all charges, the average sentence has been 41 months, or about 3½ years, The Post’s data shows. For those who pleaded guilty, the average felony sentence is now about 2½ years, but those who were convicted at trial received an average of 5 years in prison....
The average sentence for those convicted of assaulting a police officer is more than 45 months, The Post’s data shows. The average sentence for those convicted of obstructing an official proceeding has been 39 months. Nearly 400 defendants have been placed on probation, either as their full sentence or after their incarceration, for periods that extend beyond this November’s presidential election....
The sentencings by the 15 judges appointed by Democratic presidents are not much different from the nine appointed by Republicans. Those appointed by Democrats have imposed jail or prison sentences in 65 percent of the cases, compared with 63 percent of cases sentenced by Republican appointees, according to Post data....
Four Trump appointees have imposed incarceration in 57 percent of cases, compared with 67 percent for nine Obama appointees and three George W. Bush appointees. Three Biden appointees have imposed jail or prison only 20 percent of the time, but they have heard only 30 cases and four felonies. Only one active judge has sent every single defendant to jail or prison: Tanya S. Chutkan, the judge handling the D.C. prosecution of Trump, has ordered all 39 of her defendants behind bars.
January 5, 2024 at 08:36 PM | Permalink
Comments
Justice will not be fully served until Trump himself, the arch-insurrectionist, and the most malignant force in American politics since Jefferson Davis, gets at least 10 years in federal prison.
Posted by: anon | Jan 6, 2024 12:01:55 AM
Aaron Burr, Benedict Arnold, Jefferson Davis, Robert E Lee, Donald Trump
Posted by: historian | Jan 6, 2024 8:42:46 AM
So Donald Trump called on Congress to vote a certain way when it comes to electors---how is this not lobbying?
Posted by: federalist | Jan 8, 2024 9:08:45 AM
Federalist, from anyone else maybe. But not from the draft-dodging lying cult-leader in chief who thinks Lincoln should have negotiated a settlement to the slavery question (by leaving the country half slave), and who is the fraudster in chief, the election-denier in chief, the xenophobe in chief, the tax-cheat in chief, the megalomaniac in chief, liar in chief, the finger-f....er of women in chief, the porn-star adulterer in chief, the defamer of woman in chief, the 96-count felony defendant in chief, the stealer and distributor of national security documents in chief, the emolument clause violator in chief, the Fourteenth Amendment insurrectionist in chief, the press is "the enemy of the people" in chief, "let them rot in hell" demagogue in chief, the immigrants are "vermin" who are "poisoning the blood of our people" demagogue in chief, the Putin-lover in chief; the "soldiers are fools" in chief, especially those like McCain who were captured.
Posted by: anon | Jan 8, 2024 12:01:54 PM
anon, don't you give away the game here? It's criminal because Trump did it isn't law--it's decree, and once that genie is out of the bottle, it ain't easy putting it back in.
Posted by: federalist | Jan 8, 2024 1:10:01 PM
note how they cannot answer . . . .
Posted by: federalist | Jan 9, 2024 3:09:38 PM
You do have a tendency, federalist, to scare folks away.
Posted by: Doug B | Jan 9, 2024 3:56:55 PM
Perhaps, but I don't see how pointing out that Congressmen vote on electors--and that people get to ask them to vote a certain way . . . . is all that scary.
Posted by: federalist | Jan 10, 2024 9:50:15 AM