After prior stay, Texas Supreme Court rules state legislature lacked a lawful basis to impede execution

As reported in this AP piece, the "Texas Supreme Court on Friday ruled that a legislative subpoena cannot stop an execution after Republican and Democratic lawmakers who say Robert Roberson is innocent used the novel maneuver to pause his execution at the last minute." Here is more about the ruling and context:

The ruling clears the way for Roberson’s execution to move forward, weeks after a bipartisan group of state House lawmakers bought him more time by subpoenaing Roberson as he waited to be taken to the nation’s busiest death chamber.  Roberson was sentenced to death in 2003 for killing his 2-year-old daughter, Nikki Curtis.  He would be the first person in the United States to be executed over a conviction tied to “shaken baby syndrome,” a diagnosis that has been questioned by some medical experts.

A new execution date for Roberson has not been set, but it is certain to proceed unless Republican Gov. Greg Abbott grants a 30-day reprieve.  Abbott did not move to do so before Roberson’s original execution date and his office challenged the subpoena tactic used by lawmakers, accusing them of overstepping their power.

The state’s all-Republican high court agreed, ruling that “under these circumstances the committee’s authority to compel testimony does not include the power to override the scheduled legal process leading to an execution,” wrote Republican Justice Evan Young, issuing the opinion of the court.

The ruling addressed a subpoena issued for Roberson by the Texas House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee.  Roberson was scheduled to die by lethal injection on Oct. 17 when lawmakers, in a last-ditch effort, issued a subpoena to have him testify at the Texas Capitol days after his planned execution.  This spurred a legal conundrum between the state’s criminal and civil courts, which ultimately led to the Texas Supreme Court temporarily ruling in Roberson’s favor while it considered the matter.

Roberson has gained bipartisan support from lawmakers and medical experts who say he was convicted on faulty evidence of “shaken baby syndrome,” which refers to a serious brain injury caused when a child’s head is hurt through shaking or some other violent impact, like being slammed against a wall or thrown on the floor.

Rep. Joe Moody, who has led the effort to stop Roberson’s execution, said delaying the execution with the subpoena was “never our specific intention” and added that the court “rightly agreed” that the subpoena and lawsuit were valid. Moody insisted that Roberson could still be called to testify since the court ruling “reinforced our belief that the Committee can indeed obtain Mr. Roberson’s testimony and made clear it expects the executive branch of government to accommodate us in doing so.”

Prosecutors said that Roberson killed his daughter by shaking her violently back and forth.  Roberson’s attorneys have argued that the child’s symptoms did not align with child abuse and that she likely died from complications with severe pneumonia.  His case has garnered support from nearly 90 lawmakers across party lines and civil rights advocates who say Roberson is innocent and that he has not been given a fair trial under the state’s “junk science law.”...

The parole board voted to not recommend clemency for Roberson before his scheduled execution date, and the governor’s office said lawmakers had stepped out of line when they issued the subpoena.

The full 30-page ruling from the Texas Supreme Court is available at this link.  It is my understanding of Texas law that a new execution date cannot be set less than 90 days out from the date of its request, so it would seem Robertson could not be secheduled for execution February 2025.

Prior related post:

• Amid serious claims of innocence, Texas Supreme Court halts execution based on legislative subpoena