« Fifth Circuit panel reverses notable Second Amednment dismissal of federal felon-in-possession prosecution | Main | Rounding up lots and lots of (holiday weekend?) reading on crime and punishment and more »
November 26, 2024
New DPIC resource: "In Era of Secrecy, States Increasingly Restrict Media Access to Executions"
A helpful reder made sure I did not mean that the Death Penalty Information Center recently posted on its website this new resource titled "In Era of Secrecy, States Increasingly Restrict Media Access to Executions." Here is how the lengthy discussion gets started:
On December 18, Joseph Corcoran is scheduled to be the first person executed by Indiana officials in 15 years. For the first time, the state will use a single drug, pentobarbital, which comes from an unknown source and has been known to cause prisoners “excruciating” pain during executions. But no media witnesses will be present to relay what happens to the public. Indiana is an outlier in its policy decision to completely exclude the press from witnessing executions in the state. But a survey by the Death Penalty Information Center finds that many states now significantly restrict whether and how members of the press may observe and document the execution process.
Unobstructed media access to executions is critical because the media observes what the public cannot. States generally prohibit citizens from attending executions, so the media becomes the public’s watchdog, providing important information about how the government is following the law and using taxpayer funds. “We’re the ones that are there as the eyes and ears of the public, and we’re there to ensure that the state does it correctly,” said Rhonda Cook, a reporter for the Atlanta Journal-Constitution who has witnessed 28 executions. Without journalists seeing and hearing every step of the process, the public can only rely on official state accounts, which often refuse to acknowledge problems regardless of the evidence.
November 26, 2024 at 03:44 PM | Permalink
Comments
Doug,
Can you explain to me why the DPIC does nor qualify as “favorite partisan sources,” that some of us get reprimanded for.
Posted by: TarlsQtr | Nov 27, 2024 3:02:28 PM
Tarls: I see all sources as having at least some sort of "partisan" lean (including me). My concern is linking to off-topic pieces -- or, as I put it before, partisan sources with no sentencing-related content -- that risk diverting discussions away from the sentencing issues that most interest me here. DPIC's work is nearly always focused on sentencing-related issues, so I often note its reports and resources.
Posted by: Doug B | Nov 27, 2024 4:28:02 PM
"DPIC" is a misnomer to begin with. It's not primarily about providing information, although sometimes it does that. It's primarily a hyperbolic abolitionist platform and makes very little pretense otherwise.
Posted by: Bill Otis | Dec 1, 2024 10:25:04 PM