« Lots of news and new resources from the US Sentencing Commission | Main | Another week with another notable set of prison headline and stories »
December 5, 2024
Federal judge rejects latest plea deal between Boeing and the US government
As reported in this CNN piece, a "federal judge on Thursday rejected a plea agreement between Boeing and the US government after the company said it would plead guilty to deceiving the Federal Aviation Administration ahead of two fatal 737 Max crashes." Here are the basics:
The rejection by US District Court Judge Reed O’Connor citied his problems with the selection process for a independent monitor required in the plea deal to oversee safety and quality improvement at Boeing.
Boeing agreed in July to plead guilty to one charge of conspiracy to defraud the United States. Under the plea agreement it would pay up to $487 million in fines — a fraction of the $24.8 billion that families of victims of the two crashes want the company to pay.
O’Connor had problems with the idea that the Justice Department, not the court, would have approval over the selection of the monitor and how Boeing had performed under an earlier settlement with the Justice Department in January 2021 over the same charges. That agreement had deferred prosecution until the safety issues were again raised by a door plug blowing off a 737 Max plane flown by Alaska Airlines in January.
“It is fair to say the government’s attempt to ensure compliance has failed,” O’Connor wrote in his opinion. “At this point, the public interest requires the court to step in. Marginalizing the court in the selection and monitoring of the independent monitor as the plea agreement does undermines public confidence in Boeing’s probation.” One of O’Connor’s problems with the plea agreement was that the Justice Department had said Boeing and Justice would have to consider race when hiring the independent monitor. But he also was upset that the court did not have a role in the selection process....
“Rejection of the plea deal is an important victory of the families in this case and, more broadly, crime victims’ interests in the criminal justice process,” said Paul Cassell, attorney for family members of crash victims, in a statement. “No longer can federal prosecutors and high-powered defense attorney craft backroom deals and just expect judges to approve them. Victims can object – and when they have good reasons for striking a plea, judges will response.”
“This order should lead to a significant renegotiation of the plea deal to reflect the 346 deaths Boeing criminally caused and put in place proper monitoring of Boeing to ensure that it never again commits a crime like this in the future,” he added.
The full 12-page order from Judge O'Connor is available at this link.
Prior related post:
- Could families of crash victims disrupt the latest plea deal Boeing has accepted from the feds?
- Crash victims' families formally object to proposed Boeing plea deal
December 5, 2024 at 02:20 PM | Permalink
Comments
"One of O’Connor’s problems with the plea agreement was that the Justice Department had said Boeing and Justice would have to consider race when hiring the independent monitor."
DOJ's gratuitously injecting race into this thing is reprehensible. Good for the judge for canning the whole thing.
Posted by: Bill Otis | Dec 5, 2024 3:04:34 PM
I have to agree with Bill. What does race have to do with any of this?
Posted by: William Jockusch | Dec 7, 2024 12:30:21 AM
Whoever made that motion (regarding the independent monitor) should go to prison for the rest of his or her miserable life.
Posted by: federalist | Dec 9, 2024 6:16:34 PM