« Check out Villanova Law's "Criminal Sentencing Colloquium" later this week | Main | Former Judge Mark Bennett reviews his "Half Century Traversing the Arc of Federal Sentencing" »

April 22, 2025

Spicy supplemental submissions as federal sentencing for George Santos approaches

In this post last August, I pondered "what sentence for former US Rep George Santos after his plea to fraud and identity theft?".  And in this post a couple of weeks ago, I reported on and linked to dueling sentencing  memos submitted to US District Judge Joanna Seybert prior to Santos' scheduled federal sentencing on April 25, 2025.  That post detailed that federal prosecutors sought a sentence of 87 months in prison while Santos advocated for a the statutory minimum term of two years.

Intrigung, the dueling has continues as sentencing approaches through notable supplemental letters from the parties.  This CBS News piece provides some of the details along with links to the letters:

Disgraced former Rep. George Santos sent a lengthy letter to the judge set to sentence him on Friday as prosecutors seek a seven year sentence.  

Last week, a filing by the Justice Department described Santos, 36, as "unrepentant for his crimes," pointing to various social media posts he recently made. One such post said "No matter how hard the DOJ comes for me, they are mad because they will NEVER break my spirit." Another post criticized the DOJ for indicting him but not "the cabal of pedophiles running around in every power structure in the world including the US Government." In another post, Santos labeled himself a "scapegoat." 

The DOJ said those posts show Santos is approaching his sentencing "with belligerence and an insatiable appetite for 'likes,' blaming his situation on everyone except himself." The Justice Department argued that the posts are "hardly an expression of 'genuine remorse.'"...

In his letter, Santos attempts to offer a rebuttal to the DOJ filing.  Santos pointed to his August guilty plea, and statements he made at the time in court expressing regret and accepting responsibility for duping voters by fabricating his life story, as well as deceiving donors and committing identity theft, which ultimately led him to be expelled from the House.

"Those words were not a scripted contrition; they were the culmination of months of bruising self-examination. This case has cost me my congressional seat, my reputation, my livelihood, and, most painful of all, the confidence of people who believed in me. Every sunrise since that plea has carried the same realization: I did this, me. I am responsible," Santos wrote. "But saying I'm sorry doesn't require me to sit quietly while these prosecutors try to drop an anvil on my head."

Both of the supplemental filing make for interesting reads, but the three-page Santos letter is especially engaging.

Prior related posts:

April 22, 2025 at 08:50 PM | Permalink

Comments

Santos should have committed state crimes in Minnesota. He'd get a better deal: https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2025/04/the-final-problem.php

Posted by: federalist | Apr 23, 2025 9:33:03 AM

Rule 1 of being a criminal defendant -- do not talk about your case except to your lawyers. Let your lawyers and spokespersons make any comments about the case to the media. Posting on social media about how you are being persecuted does not fit well with the narrative that your lawyers are presenting that you have accepted responsibility for that offense. The presumption that most judges will have is that what you say in court is what your attorneys encouraged you to say while what you casually say outside the courtroom is what you really think.

Posted by: tmm | Apr 24, 2025 11:25:50 AM

"Rule 1 of being a criminal defendant -- do not talk about your case except to your lawyers. Let your lawyers and spokespersons make any comments about the case to the media. Posting on social media about how you are being persecuted does not fit well with the narrative that your lawyers are presenting that you have accepted responsibility for that offense. The presumption that most judges will have is that what you say in court is what your attorneys encouraged you to say while what you casually say outside the courtroom is what you really think."

I thought Rule 1 was "Keep your mouth shut and never rat out your friends."

Posted by: federalist | Apr 24, 2025 12:44:41 PM

Keep your mouth shut is part of Rule 1. Not ratting out your friends depends on what is being offered to rat out your friends. If the prosecution is willing to cut your sentence in half, it's your friends' fault for not accepting the deal first.

Posted by: tmm | Apr 24, 2025 5:40:00 PM

tmm, you missed the reference---GoodFellas.

Posted by: federalist | Apr 25, 2025 9:47:58 AM

If the prosecution is willing to cut your sentence in half, it's your friends' fault for not accepting the deal first.

The convicts in the joint have a different view.

Posted by: federalist | Apr 25, 2025 10:22:08 AM

federalist and tmm --

Your conversation reminds me of one of the reasons I never wanted to be and never became a defense lawyer.

Posted by: Bill Otis | Apr 26, 2025 7:05:10 PM

That's right, Bill. The Lord's trumpet blows and the federal prosecutor answers the call.

"We see a deadly sin on every street corner, in every home, and we tolerate it. We tolerate it because it's common, it's trivial. We tolerate it morning, noon, and night. Well, not anymore. I'm setting the example."

Posted by: Frank Fosdick | May 1, 2025 7:20:02 PM

Frank Fosdick --

What does the Lord's trumpet have to do with anything? I'm not the one hauling Sister Perjean into court to give the jury a sermon about the wonderfulness of Dzhokar Tsarnaev. And if you want to be a lawyer for him or MS-13 or George Santos, go right ahead. It's a free country and you can make that choice -- but I don't have to, and won't.

Posted by: Bill Otis | May 2, 2025 10:28:43 AM

Post a comment

In the body of your email, please indicate if you are a professor, student, prosecutor, defense attorney, etc. so I can gain a sense of who is reading my blog. Thank you, DAB